Jim Rogers: The Next 10 Years

Jim Rogers: The Next 10 Years

Written by Heather Bell – October 09, 2009 12:40 PM

I’m moving to China … possibly to live in a bunker. At least that was my inclination after listening to a presentation by Jim Rogers yesterday.

Now don’t get me wrong―Mr. Commodities wasn’t all doom and gloom. In fact, his talk was both informative and highly entertaining. But Rogers doesn’t sugarcoat things―he’s very matter-of-fact about his concerns and projections for the future. And most of them don’t bode well for the U.S.

I’ll be posting an interview with Jim Rogers on the site in the coming week, but for now, I just wanted to offer some highlights from his speech at ETF Securities’ mini-conference and the Q&A that followed.

1. The 21st century belongs to China

According to Rogers, the 19th century was the era of the British Empire and the 20th century was the U.S.’ heyday. But the 21st century is China’s (though the rest of Asia is definitely going to get a boost too).

The reasons for this are many, but some points brought up by Rogers include the following:

1. The Chinese want to live like we do;
2. They are more eager to work;
3. They are better at saving;
4. There are 1.5 billion Chinese citizens (and 3 billion people in all of Asia), and we owe them money. They are, according to Rogers, “among the best capitalists in the world.”

There will be some setbacks, of course, Rogers says, but these are opportunities. “If you see setbacks in China, you should pick up the phone and get more involved,” he advised, before adding his favorite refrain, “The best advice of any kind that I can give you is to teach your children and grandchildren Chinese.”

China’s path to world domination started with Deng Xiaoping’s capitalist programs in 1978, and there hasn’t been any looking back since. Rogers views China’s dominance as nigh-on unstoppable except for one little thing: its water problem. There are parts of the country that are running out of water, and when the water disappears, Rogers points out, so does civilization. However, the country is acting aggressively to combat the problem, and he doesn’t view it as that much of a threat.

2a. Jim Rogers is not a Ben Bernanke fan

Yep, it’s a fact. No “Team Bernanke” shirts for Jim Rogers (who said to scattered applause during the Q&A session that if he was in charge of the U.S. economy he would “abolish the Fed and resign.”).

Rogers is appalled by the government’s actions—Bernanke’s in particular. The U.S. government’s strategy calls for the debasement of the dollar, he says, calling it a “horrible policy.” While he concedes it can work in the short term, it NEVER works in the mid- or long term.

“He’s going to run those printing presses until we run out of trees, because that’s the only thing he knows,” Rogers said of Bernanke.

Add that on top of the country’s rapidly growing astronomical debt, and Rogers believes you’ve got a recipe for disaster.

2b. The U.S. dollar is screwed

Consider this a corollary to point 2a. Its status as a reserve currency is teetering on a precipice, in Rogers’ opinion, and he’s not alone. In fact, so many people are selling dollars right now that he’s sitting tight, waiting for a possible—and ultimately unsustainable—rally in order to exit the market. Of course, if it fails to rally and just drops again …

“I’ll just have to panic and sell like everyone else,” Rogers said.

3. Commodities, commodities, commodities

OK, as mentioned before, there are 3 billion people in Asia, most of whom are aspiring to play the home version of the American Dream game show. And let’s face it: American society is largely about consumption. We like stuff―we buy it, we wear it, we eat it, we flaunt it, we sometimes even bedazzle it (yeah, Google that). So that’s a lot more consumption on the global level. Rogers notes that while consumption is expected to increase exponentially, not a lot of capacity has been added in the last few decades for a lot of commodities. Meaning, not a lot of new refineries have been built, and not a lot of new resources have been discovered or excavated for a variety of commodities.

In terms of oil, Rogers cites the fact that Saudi Arabia has not seen any new oil discoveries but has consistently said for the past two decades that its reserves are at 260 billion barrels (in which time it has sold 60 billion barrels). He also points out that farmers are a rapidly disappearing species. So to sum up―that’s a lot more people competing for diminishing resources (including the all-important energy and food). Basic supply and demand theory pretty much takes it from there.

“Commodities are the second-largest asset class in the world,” Rogers noted. And they are “the best anchor” for your portfolio, he adds.

Rogers says the typical life span of a commodities bull market is 18-20 years. We’re currently in year 11 right now. Yeah, it could end tomorrow, but that whole supply and demand imperative could also extend this bull beyond its typical time frame.

During the Q&A session, though, the conversation took a darker turn. One questioner asked if the increased competition for resources might lead to war, and Rogers allowed it was a possibility, though he hoped it would not come to that. He pointed out that when a rising power clashes with an established power, the result is usually war, and said that research consistently shows that resource shortages lead to war. So, sure, commodities shortages might start World War III, but if you invest in the commodities themselves, you might at least be in decent financial shape when the shelling stops—and I’m not being flippant at all. War drives up the costs of commodities.

4. U.S. government bonds are the next big bubble

Well, would you lend money to us? Rogers says short-term bonds are probably OK, but he advises getting out of anything with a longer maturity. He calls it “inconceivable” that anyone would lend money to the U.S. for 30 years at the going rate, and notes that the U.S. was a creditor nation as recently as 1987.

“Now the U.S. is the largest debtor nation in the history of the world,” he said.

And for bond portfolio managers, he had some very pointed advice: “Get a new job.”

5. Protect yourself

The underlying theme of Rogers’ entire speech was that the world is changing, and here are some things you should know if you want to come out the better for it (and for your family members, clients, etc., to also come out the better for it) financially. Based on Rogers’ observations, it seems recognizing that change is a key step, but so is adapting to it (see advice regarding learning Mandarin, for example). And in Rogers’ eyes, commodities are a good way to achieve this protection. No investment is certain of course, but right now, he thinks commodities look pretty darn good.

Best Comment Of The Night

Addressing one audience member’s question, Rogers asked if the young man were an MBA. The questioner admitted to holding an MBA and was promptly told he should swap his MBA for an agriculture degree from Texas A&M.

“You should become a farmer,” Rogers said.

That’s an old line for Rogers, but he added a new wrinkle. If you’re not going to become a farmer, you should open the first Lamborghini dealership in Iowa. Because with farmers closing in on extinction just as the world needs more food, that’s probably what they’ll be driving in a few years.

Somali Pirates in Discussions to Acquire Citigroup

Somali Pirates in Discussions to Acquire Citigroup

By Andreas Hippin
November 20 (Bloomberg) — The Somali pirates, renegade Somalis known for hijacking ships for ransom in the Gulf of Aden, are negotiating a purchase of Citigroup.

The pirates would buy Citigroup with new debt and their existing cash stockpiles, earned most recently from hijacking numerous ships, including most recently a $200 million Saudi Arabian oil tanker. The Somali pirates are offering up to $0.10 per share for Citigroup, pirate spokesman Sugule Ali said earlier today. The negotiations have entered the final stage, Ali said.

“You may not like our price, but we are not in the business of paying for things. Be happy we are in the mood to
offer the shareholders anything,” said Ali.

The pirates will finance part of the purchase by selling new Pirate Ransom Backed Securities. The PRBS’s are backed by the cash flows from future ransom payments from hijackings in the Gulf of Aden. Moody’s and S&P have already issued their top investment grade ratings for the PRBS’s.

Head pirate, Ubu Kalid Shandu, said: “We need a bank so that we have a place to keep all of our ransom money. Thankfully, the dislocations in the capital markets has allowed us to purchase Citigroup
at an attractive valuation and to take advantage of TARP capital to grow the business even faster.”

Shandu added, “We don’t call ourselves pirates. We are coastguards and this will just allow us to guard our coasts better.”

*CITI IN TALKS WITH SOMALI PIRATES FOR POSSIBLE CAPITAL INFUSION

*WILL REQUIRE ALL CITI EMPLOYEES TO WEAR PATCH OVER ONE EYE

*SOMALIAN PIRATES APPLY TO BECOME BANK TO ACCESS TARP

*PAULSON: TARP PIRATE EQUITY IS AN `INVESTMENT,’ WILL PAY OFF

*KASHKARI SAYS `SOMALI PIRATES ARE ‘FUNDAMENTALLY SOUND’ ‘

*Moody’s upgrade Somali Pirates to AAA

*HUD SAYS SOMALI DHOW FORECLOSURE PROGRAM HAD `VERY LOW’ PARTICPATION

*SOMALI PIRATES IN DISCUSSION TO ACQUIRE CITIBANK

*FED OFFICIALS: AGGRESSIVE EASING WOULD CUT SOMALI PIRATE RISK

* FED AGREED OCT. 29 TO TAKE `WHATEVER STEPS’ NEEDED FOR SOMALI PIRATES

——————————————————————————————–

THIS IS SATIRE!

In Case You Missed It: Barry H. Obama’s 30-min infomercial

I missed most of the infomercial except for the live speech that came at the end.  Fortunately, the Obama-Biden camp posted the infomercial on youtube and other news organisations did a recap of the main points.

Here is the video:

I hope they don’t rig the election as depicted in this Simpsons episode:

Otherwise its going to be a very dangerous Wednesday (the day after Election Day).

It’s a wonderful world after all

So begins another week of nuttiness in the world markets.  The Nikkei has gone back 25 years in time with the current decline in their index and this will again unleash a vicious reaction in the other markets once they open in the coming hours.  Despite all of this nonsense, most people should not let it get to them until the day Wal-Mart becomes unaffordable and when people actually have to use cash instead of credit card to make any purchases.

On the upside, today is a great week to be a Japanese or even an American tourist.  Suddenly things have become much more affordable for these tourists.  The Yen-USD exchange rate may be incredibly shitty but no one will really bat an eye until the day Playstation 3s, JDM aftermarket parts, and Honda Civics become too pricey for the average guy.  Most of what I am talking about may seem like rocket science to McCain supporters like Joe the Plumber and the Sarah Palins of “real” America.

Still, I do hope Obama does win the election next week.  I know some Ron Paul supporters are going to scream treason or socialist sellout for my choice, but Obama is the one who actually wants to get the hell out of Iraq and the Republicans need to be punished for nominating McCain and Palin as their candidates.  Ron Paul had a strong message but he was not the right man to promote it in this day and age.

If Dr. Paul had Mitt Romney’s body, Mike Huckabee’s charm, and Obama’s youth, then I am sure many many more people would have listened, voted for him, and he would have made sincere reforms to this wreck of a country.  Unfortunately, we live in the real world and reality can be an bipolar bitch at times.

This clip shows how far we have fallen since the good old days of the Budweiser Wassup commercial:

Racism fuels final decision for Obama votes

BBC NEWS
‘Race question mark’ over US town

By Dumeetha Luthra
BBC News, Uniontown, Pennsylvania

Fayette County residents on the race issue “I’m not voting for Obama, he’s black.”

Charles is a registered Democrat in Uniontown, Pennsylvania.

“If it wasn’t for Obama I would vote Democrat. Blacks just cause trouble, that’s the taste I’ve got in my mouth.”

Race is the question mark hanging over this election.

Barack Obama is ahead in the polls. There’s a widespread feeling now that the election is his to lose.

But there is something that is worrying Democrats. How accurate are the polls? How many voters are saying they will vote for Mr Obama because they do not want to be perceived as racist?

Once they enter the polling booth will it be an entirely different story?

Simply put, how many people out there think like Charles but are not admitting it?

‘Not from here’

Charles said the vast majority of his friends felt the same way as him.

Uniontown is a rural town in south-west Pennsylvania. Its countryside is breathtaking, particularly now as the leaves change their colour from green to gold to burnt red.

But the area is poor and unemployment is high. Traditionally it is staunchly Democrat – but race is an election issue.

At a local restaurant a friendly waitress started chatting to us. The conversation turned to politics.

She shrugged, she was not even sure when the election was to be held, she could not pronounce Mr Obama’s name.

“I like McCain because I can say his name, so I’ll probably vote for McCain.”

She was not well informed, but her views were clear.

“He’s from Africa or something. I don’t even know where he’s from. I know he grew up here, but he’s not from here. I think American presidents should be from America.”

These are not isolated opinions – just not often voiced publicly.

In the primaries 12% of voters across the state said race was a factor – and that is close to Mr Obama’s current lead in the polls here.

Recently, Congressman John Murtha had this to say about his home state: “There is no question that western Pennsylvania is a racist area”.

He did, however, predict that Mr Obama would still win the state, and he later apologised for the remarks.

The polls show Mr Obama is ahead in Pennsylvania, which also has a Democratic governor and traditionally huge Democratic majorities in the major cities – Pittsburgh and Philadelphia.

‘A good show’

In Uniontown, of course I met Democrats who are voting for Mr Obama, and I also met a couple of Republicans who said they were voting Obama.

This is not about a town being racist, but rather how much the race issue is reflected in the polls.

At a local hunting shop there were a variety of opinions. Registered Democrat Tom Currens said he would vote for the Republican candidate John McCain, but not because he had a problem with Mr Obama’s racial background.

Todd Hackley, a registered Republican said he would vote for Mr McCain and had this to say on the race question:

“Race is an issue, it has to be, not that we want it to be. My thoughts are that Obama will get as many votes from the blacks, as he will not get from the whites.

“I do believe there are a lot of whites who won’t vote for him because of the colour of his skin, but I believe there are a lot of blacks who will vote for him because of his colour.”

Todd has always voted Republican and when I asked him if colour was an issue for him he said it might have been years ago, but not now.

Brandon Hafield said said he was undecided who to vote for, but when I asked if Mr Obama was a patriot he said no.

When I asked if he was American, he said: “I think he tried to be, I don’t think he is, he tries to put a good show for the people, but I don’t think he is.”

Local radio presenter Bob Fultz, who hosts a regular talk show, says prejudice is definitely present, even though few callers are willing to discuss it openly.

“White voters aren’t saying what they really think, whether that’s here in Fayette County or nationally. I had one caller who said he thinks Obama is Osama with plastic surgery.”

However, Mr Obama has gained points for his perceived ability to handle the credit crunch – and Uniontown has its own financial woes.

Russ Mechling is a retired engineer who used to be the president of the local company Fayette Engineering. He is a registered Democrat who will be voting for Mr Obama.

“There is a little bit of a racial backlash, but I think it’s becoming less and less as the economic situation gets worse and worse.

“I think that will probably cost McCain more votes than any other single factor.”
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/americas/us_elections_2008/7682876.stm

Published: 2008/10/24 01:04:24 GMT

The Bradley Effect is in play in the lesser parts of the United States.  It seems that Western Pennsylvania (with the exception of Pittsburgh) is rabidly backward, racist, and very uneducated.  It seems like these are the same people who voted for Bush in 2000, 2004 and will throw their with McCain so he can continue the War of Terror and bring America into a financial holocaust.

I do hope I am wrong and live to see Barry H. Obama become our 44th President so he can restore some sanity to the world and go after the real enemy in Afghanistan instead of dicking around in Iraq.

Exclusive First Look: The Sarah Palin Porn Flick

Exclusive First Look: The Sarah Palin Porn Flick

Hustler Video is shooting a porn with a look-alike, titled “Nailin’ Paylin.” The spelling is sic and so is Hustler.
The faux Sarah is Lisa Ann, who “will be nailing the Russians who come knocking on her back-door.” In another scene — a flashback — “young Paylin’s creationist college professor will explain a ‘big bang’ theory even she can’t deny!”

There’s also a threeway with Hillary and Condoleezza look-alikes. The video is in pre-production, but is being fast tracked for release before the election.
“YOU WANT ME TO PUT WHAT WHERE?” Not porn actress
So the company that placed an ad on Craiglist seeking a Sarah Palin lookalike for a porn shoot? Hustler! A spokesperson for founder Larry Flynt confirms that the film has already been shot, but wouldn’t release the name.

Flynt did, however, provide Radar with a copy of the script. (For what it’s worth, the working title appears to be Riding Pipeline.) Here’s the first scene. [CAUTION: GRAPHIC CONTENT]

(Open on the PALIN residence, Wasilla, Alaska. Evening. Governor SARAH PALIN is sitting on the couch, reading “all of the magazines.” She is wearing a satin negligee and bunny slippers. Her luxurious brown hair is in a bun. Her glasses rest just so on the bridge of her nose. TODD is out of town on business. TRIGG is peacefully asleep upstairs. There is a firm knock at the door. PALIN puts down her reading material and goes to answer it.)

PALIN: Who is it?

GRUFF MALE VOICE: It’s JOE, the tanning-bed repairman.

(PALIN unlocks the door and opens it)

PALIN: Hiya! You were supposed to be here two hours ago, doncha know?

JOE: I’m sorry. My snowmobile broke down outside of Matunska. I had to walk the rest of the way.

PALIN: Well, you’re in luck. I just baked a batch of chocolate-chip cookies. Why don’t you come inside and I’ll fix you a plate of ‘em?

(JOE obliges. He takes a seat on the couch. PALIN enters the kitchen and returns shortly after with the cookies. She gives them to JOE, but not before looking him up and down.)

PALIN: My oh my. That’s quite a toolbelt you have on. It looks heavy.

JOE: I have a big hammer.

PALIN: Oh, I betcha do. I love a big hammer. But I love screwdrivers, too! And wrenches. The fact is I love and respect all of America’s diverse tools, big and small. They’re what helps make us so great as a nation. Here, let me take that off for ya.

(PALIN takes a seat on the coach beside JOE and starts to undo his belt. He stops her.)

JOE: Let’s go take a look at the tanning bed first.

PALIN: Oooh, okay.

(PALIN leads JOE to the tanning salon in the basement. JOE carefully inspects the machine.)

JOE: Looks like there are just a bunch of screws loose.

PALIN: (seductively) You’re in luck. I fully support off-shore and on-shore drilling.

(PALIN pounces on JOE and throws him onto the top of the tanning bed. She quickly rips off his jeans.)

PALIN: God almighty! You are hung like a moose. Now I have to eat ya!

JOE: I’m bigger than a moose. Do you have any contraceptives?

PALIN: It’s okay. I already took a morning-after pill.

JOE: Um, are you sure it works that way?

PALIN: Are you asking me if I know what a morning-after pill is? Because I totally do! I’ll get back to ya with specifics.

(The two proceed to make furious love in a multitude of positions. PALIN amply demonstrates that she has enough experience.)

PALIN: Fuck me harder! HARDER! Pound me until my head is so empty that I can’t even remember the name of the one Supreme Court case I actually know! I want it to burn. Burn like a banned book. Oh God, Oh God, OH MY GOD! MAKE ME SEE RUSSIA FROM HERE!

(After 10 minutes, the two finish.)

PALIN: Wow-eee. I haven’t had a ride that good since Todd took me for a spin on the back of his Yamaha at the Tesoro Iron Dog.

JOE: That was amazing. What now?

PALIN: I feel so alive! Let’s grab my gay friend and go shoot wolves from the safety of a helicopter.

(End scene)
By Neel Shah 10/02/08 1:45 PM
Related: Hustler, Politics, Sarah Palin, Trail Mix

http://www.tmz.com/2008/10/08/get-a-load-of-this-whos-nailin-palin-script-1/

The Dow goes down to 8,500 while the S&P drops below 1,000

This is how many people felt today as things got crazier in the financial markets:

Here is a Mad Lib for this crisis:

It’s safe to say today was insane and there really is nothing to be done other than shorting or taking the situation in stride.  Iceland has bitten the bullet, the IMF is going all-out to reduce the crisis, while Asia is going downhill as I write this.

America has brought the world to a dangerous new era with their unregulated derivatives trade, subprime housing bubble, and their failing War of Terror.  We all need to be aware that this Bush Administration was the one who appointed Paulson, Cox and Bernanke into power.  They also were the ones to force merges and acquisitions of various financial institutions

Asian markets have opened heavily down in the wake of a plunge by US stocks to their lowest level for five years.

Tokyo’s Nikkei-225 index has dropped 11.3%, while South Korea, Australia, Singapore and Hong Kong all crashed 7% in early trading.

Despite concerted government action, investors are fearful the financial crisis will prompt a global recession.

Finance minister from the G7 leading industrial countries are set to meet in Washington to discuss the crisis.

US President George W Bush is due to make an address to the American people later in the day.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7662572.stm

Iceland is a sign of things to come

The Sarah Palin Interview Generator

Tonight’s debate was interesting with both McCain and Obama taking turns smearing each other. Obama looked bad by trying to request time to make responses while McCain was more or less appealing to base emotions when responding to tough questions. I really enjoyed the Vice Presidential debates seen last week and on Saturday Night Live more than tonight’s Presidential debate.

The good news is a few people produced a Sarah Palin Interview Generator for those who missed her interviews with Katie Couric and the press.

The URL to the Interviews are at http://www.interviewpalin.com and here are a sample of some Palin responses:

Q: What is your foreign policy experience?

A: I just gave you. But, again, we’ve got to have all options out there on Wall Street. Well, it certainly does because our our next door neighbor. They’re our next door neighbor. They’re our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska. We have trade missions back and forth. We we do about it. No way, not Americans. We do not believe in American ideals. And they attacked us. And now we are a free-thinking society. As Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the solution or not.

Q: How will you fix the economy?

A: Our economy and putting it back on the anniversary, in this nation at this time. People are getting tired of that closed door, good old boy network that has worked in Iraq and Afghanistan will lead to war and it doesn’t have to stand for that. I believe that what you are seeking, also? That strategy that has been lack, I believe, here at the oversight that has shown his foresight, his pragmatism, and his leadership abilities. And that is what has got to show the support, in this evil, in this nation, at this time. It is that my son has made a decision.

Q: What is the role of the US in Iraq and Afghanistan?

A: Afghanistan will lead to war and it doesn’t have to keep our eyes on Russia, under the leadership there. I was not a good guy who is saying that. Now, one who would seek to wipe them off the face of the fact that energy is a foundation of national security. It’s that important. It’s that important. It’s that important. It’s that significant. I have not and I think our presence in Iraq that John McCain has done, that has been allowed to be a comprehensive, long-term solution found for this problem that America is facing today. As I say, we are a free-thinking society.

Q: Why should the US elect Senator McCain?

A: John McCain has done, that has much to do with foreign policy and national security issues with Russia as Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the people. It’s a nice thing about him, too, is he is not to allow the export bans to such a degree that it’s Americans that get stuck to holding the bag without the energy independence that I’ve been working on for these years as the bailout, as the bailout, as the maverick though. Taking shots from his own party, and certainly taking shots from his own party, and certainly taking shots from the other party.

About These Interviews

This site is a parody. The answers are computer generated based on probabilities calculated from Sarah Palin’s actual speech. We think it is hilarious.

The Markov chain generated answers are surprisingly close to her actual answers. Don’t believe me? See below.

Actual Palin Interview Response

COURIC:Why isn’t it better, Governor Palin, to spend $700 billion helping middle-class families struggling with health care, housing, gas and groceries? Allow them to spend more and put more money into the economy? Instead of helping these big financial institutions that played a role in creating this mess?

PALIN: That’s why I say, I like ever American I’m speaking with were ill about this position that we have been put in where it is the tax payers looking to bailout.

But ultimately, what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the health care reform that is needed to help shore up the economy – Helping the – Oh, it’s got to be about job creation too. Shoring up our economy and putting it back on the right track. So health care reform and reducing taxes and reining in spending has got to accompany tax reductions and tax relief for Americas. And trade we’ve got to see trade as opportunity, not as a competitive scary thing. But 1 in 5 jobs being created in the trade sector today. We’ve got to look at that as more opportunity. All those things under the umbrella of job creation. This bailout is a part of that.

Video Proof

To George W. Bush: Thank You for the $700 Billion Bailout

Dear President Bush:

Your [passing of the Bailout bill] signals that you are completely out of touch with your core constituency. You and most of your colleagues probably never took a REAL economics class in college, but I would have expected you to at least look at what nationally recognized economists are saying about this bill.

Over 200 top economists across the world voiced their opposition to this bill this past week, yet somehow…terrified by threats coming from a lame duck President, that [Congress] chose to max out our nation’s credit card yet again. Mark my words, this plan will fail miserably because it fails to address the root causes of the problem: transparency, trust, (over)leverage, and OTC derivatives.

Had the [Congress] actually researched other plans and held more comprehensive hearings where the Treasury Secretary and Fed Chairman weren’t the only ones presenting the case, your colleagues could have developed a better plan. Anyway, this letter is probably going to fall on the same deaf ears that refused to acknowledge the wishes of their state’s citizens.

Sincerely,
Me

My Open Letter to Congress

Here is what my friend wrote about the American financial meltdown:

Dear Congress:

Chances are most if not all of the major commercial and investment banks are insolvent. Not one of them is opting out of the do-not-short list, and they don’t seem to have the confidence in their survival to opt out of the Level 3 asset swap program Secretary Paulson is proposing.

It is also very likely that acutely dangerous systemic risk already exists, not merely from direct lines of credit among the banks, but especially from credit default swaps, which if activated by more than one large bank default would probably bring down many others. Remember, though, that this systemic risk is highly concentrated in the top 25 or so banks in the world, and does not jeopardize the 6,000 other community banks in the U.S.

Third, it is also highly probable that as this recession worsens, and as housing values continue to sink, forcing more foreclosures, the large banks will be even closer to collapse. Having worked for several years as a derivatives trader as well as having an MBA in Finance, I can tell you that it looks like catastrophe is already here.

What Sec. Paulson wants you to believe is that catastrophe is approaching, but it can be averted if only Congress acts urgently to give him the extraordinary authority he is requesting. The implication is if you don’t give him $700 billion in borrowing authority within a week, markets will collapse and it will be all your fault.

We’ve seen this drill before, with the Patriot Act and with the Iraq War authorization. The scare tactics, the urgency, the implied threat of blame for any failure – this is what the administration does.

If insolvency is here now for the big banks, the last thing you want to do is throw $700 billion of money that is not yours at bailing out the banks who created this disaster. You’ll need every bit of that money to protect the taxpayers and their deposits in these banks when these financial companies are thrown into the bankruptcy courts. You’ll need that money to make sure consumer deposits are protected with insurance.

And forget about comparing Paulson’s plan to the RTC. These Level 3 assets aren’t homes, condos, or commercial real estate that can be easily sold at the right price. They are bits of paper giving the bond holder the right to some small portion of thousands of mortgages, a right that is shared with all the other investors, who are required to agree on what is done with foreclosed properties in the pool. This is one of the reasons no one wants to buy this stuff, and no one will for many years until it is crystal clear what the final losses will be.

Paulson is basically scaring you and the rest of Congress into giving him unprecedented power to protect his friends on Wall Street. This decision you are making is probably as momentous as the Iraq War resolution. Don’t fall for this bailout disguised as the only way to prevent Armageddon. Armageddon is already here – at least for the big banks – and it needs an entirely different solution. Spend our money protecting us, by ensuring the FDIC is properly funded, by throwing these too-big-to-fail banks into bankruptcy if they truly are insolvent, by preserving the healthy parts of these banks while in bankruptcy, and bringing them back out again so they function under much better safety and sound regulations. We’ve had airlines functioning properly and safely for years while in bankruptcy, and there is no reason we can’t do the same with banks.

Please do not fall for some useless compromise or bipartisan agreement that gives the administration what it wants in the end. Kill this proposal here and now, protect us from this bailout, and deal with the real problem – the insolvency of the major banks, not the paper that is supposedly blocking their lending capabilities.

Please feel free to contact me anytime, regardless of hour. I will fly to D.C. if I have to in order to lay this out in front of you and your economic team. It means that much to me that you are fully educated as to the ramifications of this bill before you are allowed to saddle the taxpayer with the systemic risk inherent in our current financial system.

Sincerely,

J. Clay Waliski
(501) 454-4967
(870) 552-1047